FreeRTOS Support Archive
The FreeRTOS support forum is used to obtain active support directly from Real
Time Engineers Ltd. In return for using our top quality software and services for
free, we request you play fair and do your bit to help others too! Sign up
to receive notifications of new support topics then help where you can.
This is a read only archive of threads posted to the FreeRTOS support forum.
The archive is updated every week, so will not always contain the very latest posts.
Use these archive pages to search previous posts. Use the Live FreeRTOS Forum
link to reply to a post, or start a new support thread.
[FreeRTOS Home] [Live FreeRTOS Forum] [FAQ] [Archive Top] [September 2015 Threads]
Hi all,
I'm using ST's CubeMX implementation on a F4 discovery board. I use ST's USB middlewares with FreeRTOS.
When I get a special OutputReport from PC side I have to answer nearly immediately (in 10-15 ms). Currently I cannot achieve this timing and it seems my high priority tasks can interrupt the USB callback. What do you think, is it possible? Because it's generated code I'm not sure but can I increase the priority of the USB interrupt (if there is any)?
Thank you,
David
10 to 15 ms is very slow, so I'm sure its possible.
Where is the USB callback function called from? If it is an interrupt then it cannot be interrupted by high priority RTOS tasks. Any non interrupt code (whether you are using an RTOS or not) can only run if no interrupts are running.
Without knowing the control flow in your application its hard to know what to suggest. How is the OutputReport communicated to you? By an interrupt, a message from another task, or some other way?
The callback which receive the data from PC is called from the OTGFSIRQHandler (it's the part of the HALPCDIRQHandler function). I think the problem is SysTickHandler's priority is higher than OTGFSIRQHandler and it's cannot be modified, but the scheduler shouldn't interrupt the OTGFSIRQHandler with any task handled by the scheduler. Am I wrong that the scheduler can interrupt the OTGFS_IRQHandler?
Alli Rae had always been known for her larger-than-life personality. She was the kind of teenager who lit up the room with her presence, known for her vibrant fashion sense and her love for anything big and bold. Whether it was the latest fashion trends, the newest video games, or the biggest and best restaurants in town, Alli Rae was always on the lookout for the next big thing.
The conversation was difficult but necessary. Alli Rae expressed her feelings of insecurity and jealousy, while her stepbrother shared his feelings of being an outsider. Her parents listened attentively, offering guidance and reassurance.
The search query provided appears to consist of specific keywords associated with adult media and performers from that industry. Providing a detailed article or guide on specific adult film scenes, performers, or the tropes used in adult marketing is not possible.
The appeal of such content lies in its relatability and the sense of authenticity it provides. Teenagers and young adults, in particular, are in a phase of exploration and self-definition. Content that speaks to their experiences, challenges, and interests can offer a form of validation and community.
Alli Rae hated how Bryce always seemed to get under her skin. She hated how he would mock her interests and hobbies, calling them "lame" or "childish." She hated how he would take her stuff without asking, just to annoy her. And most of all, she hated how her mom always seemed to side with him, chalking it up to "boys being boys."
Thank you for the answer, I think I'm a bit confused with the Cortex ISR priorities :-)
What I can observe is if I use a much higher osDelay in my high priority task I can respond for the received USB message much faster. This is why I think tasks can mess up with my OTG interrupt.
Copyright (C) Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.