It looks like you're asking for a comparison of kits in Microsoft Flight Simulator (FSX) versus Prepar3D (P3D) , possibly looking for which is "better."
The package includes advanced avionics like the GNS 530 (with Reality XP integration support) and a custom DigiFlight II autopilot . fsx bts vans rv 7 7a better
The BTS package is celebrated for several "high-fidelity" features that many default aircraft lack: Buying Used: Van's RV-7/7A - KITPLANES It looks like you're asking for a comparison
Superior over-the-nose visibility during taxiing and takeoff. Choosing between the "7" and the "7A" depends
Van's RV-7 and RV-7A remain some of the most highly regarded homebuilt aircraft add-ons. Choosing between the "7" and the "7A" depends entirely on your preferred flying style and landing challenges. Quick Comparison: RV-7 vs. RV-7A RV-7 (Taildragger) RV-7A (Tricycle Gear) Landing Gear Conventional (tailwheel) Tricycle (nosewheel) Ground Visibility Limited; requires "S-turns" while taxiing Excellent; clear view over the nose Speed (75% Power) ~179 knots (slightly faster) ~177 knots Off-Field Handling Better for rough/grass strips Risk of nose-overs on turf Skill Requirement High (more challenging to land) Low (modern, stable handling) Which One Is "Better" for You? Choose the RV-7 if: You want a challenge